Standards Australia · Published 2007

AS 3798:2007

Guidelines on Earthworks for Commercial and Residential Developments

AS 3798:2007 sets out guidelines for the planning, execution and inspection of earthworks for commercial and residential developments, covering site preparation, fill placement, compaction, subsoil drainage, retaining structures, slope stability and quality control. It defines fill classification (controlled fill, level 1, level 2; uncontrolled fill), prescribes compaction acceptance criteria (typically 95–98 percent standard or modified Proctor density depending on use), specifies geotechnical inspection and testing levels for fill placement, and provides reporting requirements for completed earthworks. The standard distinguishes between Class A, B and C levels of earthworks supervision and testing, with Class A being the most rigorous (full geotechnical inspection, frequent density testing, signed completion reports) and Class C being the least rigorous (limited inspection, no required testing). AS 3798 is referenced from AS 2870 (residential slabs and footings), AS 1726 (geotechnical site investigations), AS 4678 (retaining structures), and the AS 5100 series (bridge foundations) as the controlling earthworks standard. It is the deemed-to-satisfy reference for earthworks quality under NCC Volume One Section B and NCC Volume Two for Class 1 residential. The 2007 edition replaced AS 3798-1996 and remains current; minor amendments have been issued covering specific compaction-test methodology and reporting provisions.

TRSC Engineering Interpretation

AS 3798 is decision-controlling on TRSC engagements involving foundation-on-fill — typically heritage adaptive-reuse projects on filled urban sites (Spring Hill, Fortitude Valley, parts of West End and Newstead in Brisbane, where 19th-century filling on tidal swamp and gully sites is widespread), and post-construction settlement assessment of buildings constructed on fill that did not meet AS 3798 acceptance criteria at placement. Three application points matter for existing-asset practice. First, the standard's fill-classification framework determines the engineering basis for relying on as-installed fill as foundation support. Controlled fill (Level 1 or 2) placed under documented Class A or B supervision can be relied upon at AS 3798 design parameters; uncontrolled fill cannot be relied upon without site-specific investigation and load-testing. Heritage urban sites in Brisbane have extensive uncontrolled fill from 19th and early 20th century landfilling, frequently with no records of placement, compaction or material composition. For continuing-life or change-of-use Form 15 certification of buildings on uncontrolled fill, the assessment requires AS 1726 design-level investigation through the fill profile, in-situ load testing where decision-controlling, and explicit AS 3798 acknowledgement that the as-installed fill cannot be assumed to meet controlled-fill acceptance criteria. Second, AS 3798 compaction acceptance criteria differ for different uses — 95 percent standard Proctor for general structural fill, 98 percent modified Proctor for heavy-duty pavement and high-rise footing platforms, with corresponding minimum density-test frequencies. For existing structures on fill, the assessment must determine whether the as-installed fill meets the relevant acceptance criteria, typically through reconstructive review of placement records (where they exist) supplemented by current density testing through targeted boreholes. Third, AS 3798 inspection-level requirements (Class A, B, C) determine the basis on which the structural engineer can rely on the geotechnical fill report. For existing fill platforms supporting heavy structural loading (transfer-truss buildings, high-rise pile caps on improved fill), Class A inspection is typically the only basis that supports continuing-life Form 15 certification — and pre-2007 fill platforms placed under earlier inspection frameworks may not have the documentation required. TRSC's protocol on heritage urban adaptive-reuse projects in known fill zones is to commission AS 1726 design-level investigation through the fill, AS 3798 retrospective fill-classification assessment, and where decision-controlling, in-situ plate load testing or pile load testing to establish the as-installed bearing capacity. The Q1 Tower foundation review and several Brisbane CBD heritage settlement investigations have used this combined framework. Stormwater and subsoil-drainage provisions in AS 3798 are also commonly under-applied — fill platforms with inadequate drainage routinely show progressive settlement decades after placement as fill saturates and consolidates.

Form 15 RPEQ Certification Implications

TRSC Form 15 RPEQ certifications for existing-asset structural adequacy on fill or controlled-fill platforms reference AS 3798:2007 as the earthworks-quality basis. The Form 15 declaration is conditional on the foundation system being supported by fill that meets AS 3798 acceptance criteria at the relevant inspection class, or on documented engineering basis for accepting the as-installed fill condition. For continuing-life recertification of buildings on uncontrolled fill, the Form 15 file retains the AS 1726 investigation through the fill profile, the AS 3798 retrospective fill-classification assessment, and any in-situ load-testing data supporting the bearing-capacity assumption used in structural calculation. Where the as-installed fill cannot be relied upon at AS 3798 acceptance criteria, the Form 15 cannot be issued without remediation (typically pile-underpinning to bypass the fill) or documented engineering basis for restricted use.

Frequently Asked Questions

Engineering questions about AS 3798:2007

How is uncontrolled fill assessed for existing-building foundation support?
Uncontrolled fill cannot be relied upon at AS 3798 controlled-fill acceptance criteria without site-specific investigation. TRSC's protocol for buildings on uncontrolled fill is AS 1726 design-level investigation through the fill profile (typically 5 to 8 m depth in Brisbane CBD), supplemented by in-situ plate load testing or pile load testing where decision-controlling. The resulting bearing-capacity assessment is used in AS 3600 footing capacity calculation rather than the AS 3798 default values. For continuing-life Form 15 certification, the assessment must demonstrate that the foundation can carry the required loads under current and future occupancy without progressive settlement — and where the assessment is borderline, ongoing automated-total-station monitoring is specified as a Form 15 condition.
What inspection class is required for new fill platforms supporting structural loading?
Class A inspection (full geotechnical supervision, frequent density testing, signed completion reports) is the typical requirement for fill platforms supporting heavy structural loading — high-rise pile caps on improved fill, transfer-truss buildings, and any structural application where the consequence of foundation failure is high. Class B inspection (intermittent supervision, scheduled density testing) is appropriate for low-rise residential and light commercial fill platforms. Class C inspection (limited supervision, no required testing) is appropriate only for landscape and non-structural applications. For existing fill platforms, the inspection class actually applied at placement determines the basis on which structural engineering can rely on the fill — pre-2007 placements with limited documentation frequently require retrospective investigation to establish the equivalent inspection class.
Why is subsoil drainage decision-controlling for fill performance?
Fill performance under structural loading depends on maintained density and shear strength, both of which are sensitive to moisture content. Fill platforms with inadequate subsoil drainage progressively saturate over time, lose density and shear strength, and produce settlement that can continue decades after placement. AS 3798 prescribes subsoil drainage requirements for fill platforms in moisture-sensitive applications, but pre-2007 placements frequently lack adequate drainage. TRSC's heritage adaptive-reuse foundation assessments include subsoil-drainage condition review as part of the fill-platform assessment, and remediation recommendations frequently include drainage improvements as an element of the foundation upgrade.
Sources & Further Reading