Standards Australia · Published 2018

AS 4773.2:2018

Masonry in Small Buildings — Construction

AS 4773.2:2018 specifies the construction requirements for masonry in small buildings — typically Class 1 residential and Class 10 ancillary structures up to two storeys, where masonry is used as the primary structural material. It supplements AS 4773.1 (design requirements for small-buildings masonry) with practical construction provisions including masonry-unit handling, mortar mixing and placement, joint tooling, course-by-course alignment tolerances, lintel and bond-beam construction, weep-hole spacing, damp-proofing and flashing detail, control-joint placement, curing requirements, and inspection and acceptance criteria. The standard is the construction-side companion to AS 4773.1 and is the deemed-to-satisfy reference for residential masonry construction under NCC Volume Two. AS 4773.2 covers single-leaf and cavity construction in clay brick, concrete masonry, calcium silicate, and autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) blocks, with provisions appropriate to each unit type. It is widely applied across the Queensland low-rise residential and small-commercial sector and is the primary reference for masonry tradespeople and certifiers on small-building projects. The 2018 edition replaced AS 4773.2-2010 and incorporated updated workmanship tolerances, control-joint provisions, and explicit treatment of AAC construction.

TRSC Engineering Interpretation

AS 4773.2 is rarely directly applied in TRSC's commercial-asset practice, but it becomes important in three categories of engagement: heritage residential masonry assessment (heritage cottages, Queenslanders with masonry sub-floor and lower-storey elements), Class 1 to Class 9 reclassification (small residential masonry being converted to commercial use), and post-disaster small-building masonry assessment. For larger commercial masonry buildings, AS 3700 (the engineering-design masonry standard) is the controlling reference, but AS 4773.2 construction-side provisions inform inspection methodology and workmanship-acceptance criteria for any masonry construction. Three application points matter when AS 4773.2 is relevant. First, the standard's workmanship tolerances (course alignment, mortar joint thickness, plumb and level acceptance) are the basis for inspection-based assessment of as-built masonry quality. For heritage masonry where original construction predates AS 4773.2, the as-built workmanship is assessed against the standard's tolerances, with the resulting deviations documented as part of the structural condition assessment. Heritage masonry frequently shows out-of-plumb and out-of-level conditions that exceed AS 4773.2 modern tolerances, and the assessment must determine whether these deviations are evidence of original-construction practice (acceptable for heritage retention) or of subsequent settlement and movement (decision-controlling for structural intervention). Second, AS 4773.2 control-joint provisions are decision-controlling for restraint-of-shrinkage assessment in large masonry walls. The standard prescribes maximum spacing of vertical control joints (typically 6 m for clay brick, 7.5 m for concrete masonry, with reductions in restrained or shaded conditions) to manage shrinkage-induced cracking. Pre-2010 masonry frequently has inadequate or absent control joints, and the resulting shrinkage-induced cracking can be misdiagnosed as structural movement. TRSC's masonry condition assessments include explicit control-joint review against AS 4773.2 spacing, and where shrinkage-induced cracking is the diagnosed mechanism, remediation involves retrofit control-joint installation (typically saw-cut joints with backer-rod and sealant) rather than structural intervention. Third, AS 4773.2 lintel and bond-beam provisions are decision-controlling for opening-related masonry capacity assessment. The standard prescribes lintel-bearing length, bond-beam reinforcement and lintel-to-jamb integration; pre-2010 small-buildings masonry frequently has lintel construction (typically uncovered angle-iron or hollow-section lintels above window and door openings) that does not meet current AS 4773.2 provisions. For continuing-life certification, the as-installed lintel capacity is assessed against the design imposed action with the AS 3700 capacity equations applied to the as-built geometry, and where capacity is inadequate, retrofit involves either supplementary lintel installation or beam-and-jamb replacement.

Form 15 RPEQ Certification Implications

TRSC Form 15 certifications for small-buildings masonry adequacy reference AS 4773.2:2018 as the construction-side reference and AS 3700 (engineering design) as the capacity-side reference. The Form 15 declaration is conditional on the masonry meeting AS 3700 capacity provisions under the controlling design action, with the as-built workmanship documented against AS 4773.2 tolerance criteria. For heritage masonry where original construction predates the standard, the Form 15 file documents the workmanship-deviation assessment, the control-joint review, the lintel and bond-beam capacity assessment, and the engineering basis for any retention-of-existing-fabric decision. Where retrofit control joints, retrofit lintels, or workmanship-related retrofit is part of the certification scope, the Form 15 includes the post-retrofit verification.

Frequently Asked Questions

Engineering questions about AS 4773.2:2018

How are heritage masonry workmanship deviations assessed?
Heritage masonry frequently shows out-of-plumb, out-of-level and irregular-coursing conditions that exceed current AS 4773.2 modern tolerances. The assessment must determine whether these deviations are evidence of original-construction practice (acceptable for heritage retention) or of subsequent settlement and movement (decision-controlling for structural intervention). TRSC's protocol uses 3D LiDAR scanning to document current geometry, automated-total-station monitoring over time to detect ongoing movement, and historic-photograph comparison where available. Where the deviations are stable (no measurable ongoing movement) and consistent with original-construction practice, the heritage retention basis supports continuing-life certification. Where the deviations are evidence of ongoing movement, the structural mechanism must be diagnosed and remediation specified.
Are control joints required in heritage masonry?
Heritage masonry typically does not have explicit control joints — the practice of installing dedicated control joints to manage shrinkage-induced cracking developed in the modern era and was incorporated into AS 4773.2 through successive editions. Pre-2010 masonry frequently has inadequate or absent control joints, and the resulting shrinkage-induced cracking can be misdiagnosed as structural movement. TRSC's masonry condition assessments include explicit control-joint review against AS 4773.2 modern spacing, and where shrinkage-induced cracking is the diagnosed mechanism, remediation involves retrofit control-joint installation (saw-cut joints with backer-rod and sealant) rather than structural intervention. The Form 15 documents the diagnosis basis and the retrofit specification.
How are pre-2010 masonry lintels assessed?
Pre-2010 small-buildings masonry frequently has lintel construction (typically uncovered angle-iron or hollow-section lintels above window and door openings) that does not meet current AS 4773.2 provisions for bearing length, jamb integration, and corrosion protection. For continuing-life certification, the as-installed lintel capacity is assessed against the design imposed action with AS 3700 capacity equations applied to the as-built geometry. Where capacity is inadequate, retrofit options include supplementary lintel installation (typically a Helifix bed-joint reinforcing lintel system), full lintel replacement (for severely deteriorated lintels), or jamb-and-lintel replacement (where adjacent masonry is also degraded). The retrofit selection reflects the heritage value of the existing fabric, the cost-of-intervention envelope, and the residual-life horizon.
Sources & Further Reading