AS 5100.2:2017
Bridge Design — Design Loads
AS 5100.2:2017 specifies the design loads to be applied to bridges in Australia under AS 5100.1 design philosophy. It defines the SM1600 design vehicle (a 1600 kN moving truck-and-trailer used as the basis for road-bridge design), the M1600 stationary lane load, the W80 wheel load and the A160 axle load, and prescribes their distribution and application across the bridge deck. The standard also specifies pedestrian, cyclist and equestrian loads (5 kPa for crowd-loaded structures, with reductions for sparsely-loaded categories), bridge-specific wind loading via reference to AS 1170.2, thermal actions, shrinkage and creep effects, vehicular collision loads, derailment loads for rail bridges, and stream-flow and debris loads for river crossings. AS 5100.2 is referenced from AS 5100.5 (concrete) and AS 5100.6 (steel and composite) as the design-action basis for bridge capacity calculations. The 2017 edition replaced AS 5100.2:2004 + amendments and incorporated the SM1600 vehicle (which had previously been published only by individual road authorities), updated pedestrian dynamic-loading provisions, and refined collision-load treatment. Amendment 1 (2020) clarified specific load-combination provisions for road-rail combined-use bridges.
AS 5100.2 directly governs every existing-bridge capacity assessment that TRSC performs on pedestrian, internal-precinct and adaptive-reuse bridge structures. Three application points matter for existing-asset practice. First, the SM1600 vehicle is a 1600 kN moving load that produces design moments and shears materially higher than earlier-edition design vehicles (T44 and L44 from AS 5100.2:2004 and predecessors). For existing road-bridge assessment of structures designed before 2017, SM1600 application requires re-checking moment and shear capacity against the higher action, which can flip a previously compliant deck to non-compliant. The decision-controlling case is short-span (5 to 25 m) road-bridge slabs and beams where SM1600 wheel concentration produces local moment higher than the equivalent T44 case. TRSC's bridge-element assessments include explicit SM1600 application with deck-distribution analysis per the standard, and the Form 15 documents whether the structure was assessed for SM1600 or for an explicitly defined alternative (typically a routes-mass-management restriction agreed with the road authority). Second, AS 5100.2 pedestrian loading is decision-controlling on pedestrian and shared-use bridges. The 5 kPa crowd load is applied for serviceability and ULS, but the dynamic component — pedestrian-induced excitation in the 1.5-to-2.5 Hz vertical range and 0.5-to-1.2 Hz lateral range — is the more commonly under-applied check. AS 5100.2 references AS 5100.1 vibration-acceptance criteria; existing pedestrian-bridge assessment must demonstrate compliance with the acceleration limit (typically 0.7 m/s² peak vertical, 0.2 m/s² peak lateral) under the design crowd density. TRSC's pedestrian-bridge dynamic checks combine measured modal frequencies (from in-situ vibration testing) with calculated pedestrian-excitation forcing per AS 5100.2 to derive the as-installed acceleration response, which is compared against the standard's acceptance criteria. Third, the standard's thermal action provisions (Section 6) govern long-span bridge assessment for SLS and ULS combinations including the thermal differential through the deck depth. Existing bridges with restricted-movement bearings — typically heritage and pre-1970 structures — frequently have thermal-action behaviour that does not match the design-intent free-movement assumption, with thermal stresses inducing measurable creep and cracking. TRSC's bridge condition assessments document bearing condition and free-movement restriction, then re-derive AS 5100.2 thermal action with the actual restraint condition rather than design-intent. Where thermal-induced cracking or movement is observed, the assessment quantifies whether the cracking is consistent with the as-installed thermal regime or evidence of additional structural distress. Stream-flow and debris loading per AS 5100.2 is applied to river-crossing bridges where the proximate flood pathway is decision-controlling — relatively rare in TRSC's commercial practice but applicable to internal-precinct bridges over flood-prone landscape elements.
Form 15 RPEQ certifications for existing pedestrian and precinct-bridge structural adequacy reference AS 5100.2:2017 as the design-action basis. The Form 15 declaration is conditional on the bridge meeting the design action under SM1600 (or explicitly documented alternative vehicle), pedestrian-crowd loading, dynamic-response acceptance criteria, and thermal-action combinations. For pre-2017 existing road bridges undergoing continuing-life recertification, the Form 15 file documents whether SM1600 was applied or whether an alternative vehicle was used by agreement with the road authority — and the engineering basis for that selection. Pedestrian-bridge Form 15 certifications include measured natural frequency, measured damping, and the calculated peak acceleration response, with the result compared against the AS 5100.2/AS 5100.1 acceptance criteria. The Form 15 also documents the thermal-action assumption and the as-installed bearing condition that supports it.
Engineering questions about AS 5100.2:2017
How does SM1600 differ from earlier bridge design vehicles?
How is pedestrian dynamic loading applied?
When does thermal action become decision-controlling?
- GovernmentAS 5100.2:2017 — Standards Australia