IENon-Destructive Testing

Impact Echo Testing

Slab Delamination and Internal Void Detection by Stress Wave Analysis

Technical Specifications
Impactor Diameter3–19mm steel spheres (frequency dependent)
Frequency Range1–80 kHz (concrete applications)
Thickness Range75mm – 2000mm (concrete)
Accuracy±3% of actual thickness
Test Speed~10 seconds per test point
StandardsASTM C1383, ACI 228.2R

Impact echo testing uses short-duration mechanical impacts to generate stress waves that propagate through concrete and reflect from internal interfaces, delaminations, voids, honeycombing, and the far surface of the element. A transducer adjacent to the impact point records the reflected waves, and frequency analysis identifies the depth and nature of reflecting interfaces. This provides a reliable method for detecting hidden defects that cannot be seen from the surface and may not be detectable by GPR.

The technique is particularly effective for assessing concrete bridge decks, car park slabs, and building floor slabs where delamination between the reinforcement layer and the surface, often caused by corrosion-induced expansion, is the critical defect. Delamination planes that are invisible from both surfaces produce characteristic frequency shifts in the impact echo response, allowing TRSC to map the extent of delamination across a slab without coring or destructive investigation.

Impact echo also provides an independent method for measuring concrete element thickness from one side only, which is valuable for verifying as-built dimensions when access to both faces is restricted. The measured thickness is compared with design drawings (where available) or used directly in structural capacity calculations. Accuracy is typically ±3% of actual thickness for well-characterised concrete.

TRSC uses impact echo as a complementary technology alongside GPR, UPV, and half-cell potential mapping. Where GPR identifies reinforcement layout and half-cell mapping identifies corrosion zones, impact echo identifies the resulting structural consequence, whether corrosion has progressed to the point of delamination. This integrated approach ensures that intervention decisions are based on actual structural condition rather than inferred condition.

Technical Scope
impact echodelamination detectionvoid detectionslab testingstress wavefrequency analysisASTM C1383concrete thickness
Direct Contact

Speak with an RPEQ-qualified structural engineer about deploying this technology on your asset.

1300 024 184

Applications

Delamination Mapping

Detecting and mapping subsurface delamination planes in concrete slabs, bridge decks, and pavements caused by corrosion-induced reinforcement expansion.

Void Detection

Identifying internal voids, honeycombing, and areas of incomplete grout fill in post-tensioning ducts and precast concrete connections.

Thickness Measurement

Measuring concrete element thickness from one side only, validating as-built dimensions for structural capacity calculations.

Grouted Duct Assessment

Evaluating grout condition in post-tensioning ducts to assess tendon corrosion risk from incomplete or deteriorated grouting.

Repair Quality Verification

Assessing bond quality between repair patches and parent concrete, identifying debonded repairs that may require re-treatment.

Bridge Deck Assessment

Systematic assessment of reinforced concrete bridge decks for delamination, spalling risk, and concrete quality variation.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does impact echo differ from GPR?

GPR detects interfaces between materials with different electromagnetic properties (e.g. steel in concrete). Impact echo detects interfaces between materials with different acoustic impedance (e.g. concrete-air boundaries at voids and delaminations). The two technologies detect different types of defects and are complementary. GPR excels at reinforcement mapping; impact echo excels at delamination and void detection.

Can impact echo detect all types of defects?

Impact echo is most effective for planar defects (delaminations, cracks parallel to the surface) and volumetric defects (voids, honeycombing) that create a concrete-air interface. It is less effective for tight cracks, vertical cracks, or defects that do not create a significant acoustic impedance contrast. TRSC selects the appropriate technology based on the type of defect being investigated.

Is impact echo suitable for thin elements?

Impact echo requires a minimum element thickness of approximately 75mm to generate interpretable frequency responses. For thinner elements, the frequency content overlaps with surface wave effects and interpretation becomes unreliable. Most structural concrete elements exceed this minimum thickness.

Deploy IE on your asset

Every investigation begins with a direct conversation with an RPEQ-qualified structural engineer. No sales intermediary, contact TRSC to discuss whether impact echo testing is appropriate for your structural question.

Impact Echo Testing (IE) | TRSC